Thursday, January 6, 2011

Oceanic “garbage patch” not nearly as big as portrayed in media

I interpret this as saying that the amount of plastic trash in a particular ocean area the size of Texas is roughly the same as the amount of plastic trash in the state of Texas. To me, it shows how issues like this can be exaggerated in order to appear more urgent, and the result is that it encourages solutions that may not be effective or appropriate to the magnitude of the problem, and when the exaggeration is exposed, it causes the general public to lose confidence in the scientists promulgating it. And there were many scientists repeating it, most of whom never even investigated the issue because they heard it from their sources and they "knew" it was right.

Two wins for science in one day. Yay!

Amplify’d from oregonstate.edu

CORVALLIS, Ore. – There is a lot of plastic trash floating in the Pacific Ocean, but claims that the “Great Garbage Patch” between California and Japan is twice the size of Texas are grossly exaggerated, according to an analysis by an Oregon State University scientist.

“There is no doubt that the amount of plastic in the world’s oceans is troubling, but this kind of exaggeration undermines the credibility of scientists,” White said. “We have data that allow us to make reasonable estimates; we don’t need the hyperbole. Given the observed concentration of plastic in the North Pacific, it is simply inaccurate to state that plastic outweighs plankton, or that we have observed an exponential increase in plastic.”

The studies have shown is that if you look at the actual area of the plastic itself, rather than the entire North Pacific subtropical gyre, the hypothetically “cohesive” plastic patch is actually less than 1 percent of the geographic size of Texas.

Among other findings, which White believes should be part of the public dialogue on ocean trash:


  • Calculations show that the amount of energy it would take to remove plastics from the ocean is roughly 250 times the mass of the plastic itself;


  • Plastic also covers the ocean floor, particularly offshore of large population centers. A recent survey from the state of California found that 3 percent of the southern California Bight’s ocean floor was covered with plastic – roughly half the amount of ocean floor covered by lost fishing gear in the same location. But little, overall, is known about how much plastic has accumulated at the bottom of the ocean, and how far offshore this debris field extends;


  • It is a common misperception that you can see or quantify plastic from space. There are no tropical plastic islands out there and, in fact, most of the plastic isn’t even visible from the deck of a boat;


  • There are areas of the ocean largely unpolluted by plastic. A recent trawl White conducted in a remote section of water between Easter Island and Chile pulled in no plastic at all.

There are other issues with plastic, White said, including the possibility that floating debris may act as a vector for introducing invasive species into sensitive habitats.

“If there is a takeaway message, it’s that we should consider it good news that the ‘garbage patch’ doesn’t seem to be as bad as advertised,” White said, “but since it would be prohibitively costly to remove the plastic, we need to focus our efforts on preventing more trash from fouling our oceans in the first place.”

Read more at oregonstate.edu
 

No comments:

Post a Comment

"Multiliteracy"

This is a picture of my daughter's award from the Delaware DOE for "Multiliteracy". (Is "Multiliteracy" a word?)  ...