Monday, August 13, 2018

"Multiliteracy"

This is a picture of my daughter's award from the Delaware DOE for "Multiliteracy". (Is "Multiliteracy" a word?)  Notice that the award is for "Advanced Low-Level Proficiency", as opposed to (I suppose) "Basic Low-Level Proficiency" or any higher proficiency. Also, it is not clear where the proficiency (or lack thereof) resides:  Is she low-level in Chinese, or English, or both?  I have my suspicions ...

Tuesday, July 3, 2018

Security Theater of the Day

Ye Gods.  The first sign of the Apocalypse arrives as TSA agents nationwide start demanding travelers remove snacks from their carry-ons during screening.
“It definitely caused a delay — not huge, but at least by like five or 10 minutes,”
 Yes it is Security Theater, but still safely categorized as a First World Problem.



Saturday, April 21, 2018

Thursday, March 15, 2018

On Torture

Listen, you can defend torture, or you can defend the Constitution. Not both. The 8th Amendment explicitly forbids torture with all forms of cruel and unusual punishment. To defend torture is to attack the Constitution.


This should be remembered.

Tuesday, March 13, 2018

Ch-Ch-Ch-Changes

Of all the members of President Trump's cabinet, I have found Rex Tillerson to be the most surprising and least objectionable.  I'm sorry to see him go, particularly with The Donald's typical "class", and I see it as a setback for the "adults" in the Administration.

Mike Pompeo is a blow-hard, and always has been.  Big hat, no cattle, as they say.  I'm sure whatever he does will be constantly overshadowed by his boss's actions, much like his predecessor.

Interesting coverage of the the new pick for CIA, Gina Haspel; CBS News says Gina Haspel, new CIA director, is a "seasoned spymaster", and mentions that she
...is a career spymaster who once ran a CIA prison in Thailand where terror suspects were waterboarded...Haspel briefly ran a secret CIA prison where accused terrorists Abu Zubayadah and Abd al Rahim al-Nashiri were waterboarded in 2002, according to current and former U.S. intelligence officials, who spoke to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity. She also helped carry out an order that the CIA destroy its waterboarding videos. That order prompted a lengthy Justice Department investigation that ended without charges. 
The NYT is a bit less nuanced.
Gina Haspel oversaw the torture of two terrorism suspects and later took part in an order to destroy videotapes documenting their brutal interrogations at a secret prison in Thailand.
Neither source points out that she has an EU arrest warrant for her participation in torture.

Particularly troubling is the fact that the the CIA, not to mention the Administration or a good chunk of the American people, really have no problem with this:
Within the C.I.A., Ms. Haspel is similarly respected, and the agency’s announcement about her promotion came with a long list of testimonials from retired officials, much as prominent authors write blurbs for the back of other writers’ books. The list notably included prominent Obama administration officials, such as James R. Clapper Jr., the former director of national intelligence (“very pleased”), and Michael J. Morell, who twice served as the C.I.A.’s acting director (“I applaud the appointment”).
The praise for Ms. Haspel, despite her role in torturing detainees, reflects the agency’s ambivalent attitude toward those who participated in the interrogation program.
Is this really how the United States wants to represent itself to the world?  Perhaps someone in the Senate will consider this during the confirmation process.

Friday, July 15, 2011

Five ways Facebook can fight back against Google+

An interesting take. I think these all sound good except the third, "Get rid of apps." Apps is really the current Facebook innovation, and clearly the direction Facebook is going. It is too early to declare defeat and reverse course, just because G+ is out.



Interesting that "Do better on privacy" didn't make the list...

Amplify’d from www.macworld.com



Five ways Facebook can fight back against Google+

At the resulting press conference on July 6, Zuckerberg protested (perhaps a little too much) that Facebook wasn’t worried about the amazing success of Google’s social network. The features he announced that day, including group and video chat, seem clearly aimed at Google+, but appear not to have set the world on fire. What can Facebook do to win back the crowd?

Here are five things we think Facebook could do to cope with the power and possibilities of Google+.

Make new friends

As long as the two companies insulate themselves from each other, users frustrated with having to repeat themselves and upload photos multiple times will end up choosing the sleeker social network over the older, tired one. I refer you to the Facebook and MySpace struggle of 2004-2010—except this time Facebook risks repeating MySpace’s mistakes.

Instead, Facebook should put differences aside and allow Google+ users to import their friends from Facebook to Google+. Facebook should deal with Google+ the same way it dealt with Twitter: Permit Google+ users to link their updates to Facebook and, in exchange, Facebook opens up its content to Google+.

Build an ecosystem

Although Facebook is a terrific platform for many things, it isn’t the one-stop shop for Web services that Google is fast becoming. Remember that Facebook and Google are competing to be “always-on” Web destinations. The problem with Facebook’s modular approach is that it gives me too many reasons to step away. I often find myself surfing away from Facebook for some vital service it doesn’t provide, or closing out the window when I’m “done” with the site.

But I’d also like to have more sharing across the Facebook site itself. Facebook needs to think of its services not as individual, modular apps but as linked services, the same way Google does. Groups, chat, and events are starting to see some integration, but the social networking giant still has a long way to go before I can, for instance, organize, create, and share an event just on Facebook.—David Daw

Get rid of apps

But the annoyances outweigh the benefits of the Facebook platform as it currently stands (and as services like Flickr and Twitter show, you don’t need something as large as Facebook Apps to make integration with other apps and websites possible). My Facebook feed is littered with messages from friends’ FarmVille sessions. At any given time, I have a number of app requests and invitations waiting for me.

Most of all, Apps took away some of what made Facebook an attractive alternative to MySpace in the first place. In the early years, Facebook was a clean, well-designed website that made it easy to connect with the people you know. The arrival of Facebook Apps was a pretty significant blow. And while Google+ has some quirks that need to be worked out, it already does a good job of accomplishing what Facebook used to be known for.—Nick Mediati

Compete with Circles

Really, all Facebook needs to do is make the Lists feature more prominent and ubiquitous. If Facebook were to allow wall posts, photo/video sharing, event invitations, and all other instances of social sharing to be sent to specific lists, the company would essentially duplicate the functionality of Circles. Obviously, Facebook would want to prompt users to put their friends in a list each time they add a friend, and the entire Lists interface needs work, but those are problems that Facebook could solve in the short term. The underlying technology—the hard part—is already part of the platform.

Trim down notifications

I really don’t want to know each and every time one of my friends becomes friends with someone I don’t know. Although we can hide certain friends and apps to clean up the clutter, the options to do so on Facebook are limited. Either I can hide a single post, or completely mute an individual so that he or she never appears in my news feed again. Why not just give the option to hide notifications when someone changes their profile picture, or when they enter a relationship?

Right now Facebook has too much clutter, but I dare not mute anyone because I don’t want them to drop off my social radar. Give us more control to filter out what we see in our news feed, and maybe, just maybe, I will come back—ready to poke people again (heck, I may even play a game of Tetris or two, just like in the old days). Until then, Facebook, it’s over between us. I’m moving over to Google+, the sexy new social network on the block
Read more at www.macworld.com
 

"Multiliteracy"

This is a picture of my daughter's award from the Delaware DOE for "Multiliteracy". (Is "Multiliteracy" a word?)  ...